BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT
MATTHEWS: Well, Congressman Moran, I want to just read some of the
language in this proclamation. For those who have mixed feelings about
this, I don"t think you"re have them very long. The way he describes the
Civil War--first of all, he calls it "the war between the states," it was
a war of independence. It sounds like the original war for independence.
It was fought for people"s homes and communities and the commonwealth.
They were fighting a war of defense, basically. But they were overwhelmed
by the insurmountable numbers and resources of the Union army.
No mention of which side may have been right on the issue of slavery.
No mention of slavery, just this, as I said, sanitized version of history.
This is like one of those Soviet history books we used to read about, where
they set it up their way. Your thoughts, Jim? Congressman?
REP. JIM MORAN (D), VIRGINIA: Well, Chris, it was written by the Sons
of the Confederacy, who continue to refer to the Civil War as the second
American revolution. You know, James McPherson, who as you know, was the
eminent historian of the Civil War, has made clear the Civil War was fought
because a man opposed to slavery was elected president and that"s why the
states seceded. They seceded from this country. They wanted to destroy
this country so they had the right to own other human beings! And as Doug
has said, there were 500,000 slaves in Virginia at the time. And Virginia
fought the war so that they could continue to own those human beings!
And, for Governor McDonnell to suggest that this was not about
slavery, to commemorate the Civil War as though this was some, you know,
neutral part of American history, this was all about slavery.
And these people wanted to destroy our country, so that they could
control other human beings. And we ought to face up to that...
MATTHEWS: Yes.
MORAN: ... get beyond it, and--and--but it"s very much related to
the first part of your show. This is about appealing to that base who
wants to change...
MATTHEWS: Yes.
MORAN: ... history and wants to change the country for the worse.
MATTHEWS: Well, the progress of America has always been two steps
forward and one step backwards.
(LAUGHTER)
MATTHEWS: Here"s Congresswoman Michele Bachmann at a rally in March.
Let"s listen to her. She makes a point that I don"t think is defensible.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
REP. MICHELE BACHMANN ®, MINNESOTA: Democrats said that they were
called N-word, which, of course, would be wrong and inappropriate. But no
one has any record of it. No witness saw it. It"s not on camera. It"s
not on audio. They were told--they said that they were spat upon. No
one saw it.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
MATTHEWS: Audio, Congresswoman? Audio?
Here"s a voice-mail left at the office of Congressman John Lewis.
Let"s listen. I hope that you"re listening, Congresswoman Bachmann.
(BEGIN AUDIO CLIP)
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: That God (EXPLETIVE DELETED). Don"t tell me I got
to get some God (EXPLETIVE DELETED) health insurance. I ain"t paying no
God (EXPLETIVE DELETED) fine. Tell that (EXPLETIVE DELETED) he can come
put my (EXPLETIVE DELETED) in jail if he don"t like it.
(END AUDIO CLIP)
MATTHEWS: Well, the N-word was used prolifically--prolifically the,
Governor, as you wouldn"t be surprised.
(LAUGHTER)
MATTHEWS: The language was familiar from the past. It"s still out
there. It"s redolent of the bad old days. But anybody in public life
knows these words are not far from the lips of some people.
We saw, of course, Congressman Cleaver get spat upon. We have an
adequate visual record of that. And I think the congresswoman should pay
attention to that scene.
There it is. Amazing. There it is, Congressman Cleaver trying--
well, he restrained--he was a gentleman. The other guy was worse than I
can think about. There he is. He won"t even stop with his spittle.
Congressman--governor, you have been through all this. Why do you
think people are going--is this a play for what"s called the Republican
base? Is this just clearly aimed at the...
WILDER: I don"t think so, no.
MATTHEWS: ... the people who don"t like change? Or what is it?
WILDER: I think it"s a miscalculation, period. That--that base
doesn"t belong any place in forging any what I call majority party or
majority manipulation any place in America today.
The American people are past this. Jim Moran absolutely right. What
this proclamation suggests is that that period was something, well, just a
little spat. Well, we did the best we could, but we were overwhelmed.
(LAUGHTER)
WILDER: And why were we overwhelmed? We were overwhelmed because the
right one--if those people that had been successful, you and I wouldn"t
be here talking like we are today. I know I wouldn"t be here at all under
any circumstances.
And, so, it is revisionist history. Unfortunately, it got its play.
I hope the governor sees fit to revise his statements, even revise the
proclamation, because, if he doesn"t, it will be an evergreen story, and it
will be something that will continue to define his administration. He
doesn"t need that. He shouldn"t want that. Virginians are beyond that.
MATTHEWS: I want to get to the constitutional questions here,
gentlemen.
And, Congressman Moran, I want you to jump on this here. Here"s the
health care issue, which is still very much debated in this country.
Here"s Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum, a former colleague of yours,
who is running--he"s attorney general in Florida, but he"s running for
governor down there. And he"s hitting this issue pretty hard.
"It"s the constitutional duty I have," he says, "to protect the
citizens of Florida, to protect an unconstitutional--to protect it from
an unconstitutional invasion of the state," using the words like the
sovereignty of the state, the invasion of the state by the north.
Then you have got Rick Perry--we will have to play this again--we
have played it so many times--he"s talking up succession. We got a
Republican candidate for governor down there talking about nullification,
interposition.
This stuff, Jim, you and I grew up with. We studied it in school.
Governor, you lived through it.
These words like nullification, I mean, do we have to go back to Dr.
King to--to get some refutation here. Congressman, what"s going on?
MORAN: I don"t know...
(CROSSTALK)
MATTHEWS: Why are they talking this language of secession and
nullification again?
MORAN: Well, you know, it"s human nature.
And they fought the Civil War because a man who was opposed to slavery
was elected president. I think a lot of this has to do with the fact that
we have an African-American president who has an agenda. He wants to make
-- create equal opportunity for everyone in this country. He wants to make
this a greater, more inclusive society.
I think he"s doing a good job, personally. But they object to who"s
doing it and what his ultimate objective is, because they think this is
their country. And I don"t think...
MATTHEWS: Yes.
WILDER: I think a lot of this has do with race, but a whole lot of it
has to do with this attitude that government is the enemy. It started back
in 19 -- in the 1980s.
And, you know, it sure is defining the Republican vs. the Democratic
Party. It"s a schism. But I don"t think that these folks represent more
than 20 percent of the American electorate. Let"s hope not.
MATTHEWS: Congressman Moran, thank you, as always.
And, Congressman...
WILDER: Chris...
(CROSSTALK)
MATTHEWS: Governor, I have got to cut you off, but thank you so
much...
WILDER: OK. Good. We will talk. We will talk.
MATTHEWS: ... for coming on the program.
WILDER: Thanks again. Real good.
MATTHEWS: It"s an honor to have you on, sir.
WILDER: Always good.
MATTHEWS: Up next...
WILDER: Thank you, sir.
MATTHEWS: ... why is Rudy Giuliani criticizing President Obama for
doing something that Ronald Reagan said he wanted to do over and over
again, get rid of nuclear weapons, get rid of the threat of them? Check
out the "Sideshow" tonight. Some of these guys ought to do a little
dusting up on their--well, pull out the history books once in a while and
read them again.
You"re watching HARDBALL, only on MSNBC.
BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT